Abstract
Holland's RIASEC calculus and Prediger's World-of-Work Map are viable heuristics for portraying vocational interests as they relate to vocational choice. These heuristics presuppose that at least one of Holland's hypotheses about achievement, stability, or satisfaction is theoretically and empirically sound. This paper questions the utility of the RIASEC and World-of-Work heuristics by presenting evidence that challenges the aforementioned hypotheses. A rationale is given for vocational psychology to direct its energies elsewhere.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
