Is hepatectomy feasible for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with clinically significant portal hypertension and beyond the Milan criteria?

Abstract

BackgroundHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) and beyond the Milan criteria undergoing hepatectomy were previously considered to be at high risk and to have a poor prognosis, especially for major hepatectomy. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of hepatectomy in those patients. MethodsData were collected on HCC patients with CSPH treated at a single centre from January 2010 to October 2021. Propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was used to balance the bias between groups. ResultsOf the included patients, 556 underwent hepatectomy and 172 underwent transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). Comparison of patients beyond the Milan criteria and those with Milan criteria underwent hepatectomy, the 90-day mortality and complication rates were similar in the two groups. However, the overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of patients within the Milan criteria were significantly better than those beyond the Milan criteria (p < 0.001). In HCC patients beyond the Milan criteria, OS of performing hepatectomy was significantly longer than TACE (p < 0.001). Within HCC patients beyond the Milan criteria underwent hepatectomy, there was no significant difference in 90-day mortality and complications between minor and major hepatectomy in patients beyond the Milan criteria and no significant difference in RFS and OS after PSM. ConclusionsHepatectomy for HCC patients with CSPH and beyond the Milan criteria is safe and feasible, with an acceptable prognosis and no significant difference between minor and major hepatectomy.