Abstract

BackgroundThrough improved service provision and accessibility, 20-min neighbourhoods (20MNs) aim to enable people to meet most of their daily (non-work) needs within 20 min from home. Associations between 20MNs and food practices remain unknown. This study examines links with the frequency and location of eating out behaviours as well as the frequency of home food delivery.MethodsThis cross-sectional study used data from 769 adults from the Places and Locations for Activity and Nutrition study (ProjectPLAN) conducted in Melbourne and Adelaide, Australia, between 2018 and 2019. Outcomes were 1) visit frequency to i) cafés, ii) restaurants, bars or bistros, iii) major chain fast food outlets and iv) takeaway outlets to purchase food; 2) total number of different types of out-of-home food outlets visited; 3) use frequency of home food delivery services; 4) distance from home to the most frequented out-of-home food outlets. Exposure was whether participants had a 20MN (areas with high service/amenity provision) or a non-20MN (areas with low service/amenity provision). Ordinal regression models were fitted for the frequency outcomes. Poisson regression models were fitted for the number of different outlet types. Linear and spatial regression models were fitted for the distance outcomes.ResultsResults suggested no differences in frequency of visitations to out-of-home food outlets and use of food delivery services between those with a 20MN and those with a non-20MN. Yet, those with a 20MN were more likely to use a greater number of different types of outlets on a weekly basis. Where a regular eating out location was reported, it was nearer to home for those with a 20MN.ConclusionsThis study provides evidence supportive of 20MNs potentially facilitating more localised food practices, however, 20MNs may also encourage greater cumulative frequency of meals out across a variety of out-of-home food providers.

Highlights

  • Through improved service provision and accessibility, 20-min neighbourhoods (20MNs) aim to enable people to meet most of their daily needs within 20 min from home

  • Full list of author information is available at the end of the article

  • This study examines associations between 20MNs and the frequency and location of eating out behaviours as well as the frequency of home food delivery in Melbourne where the 20MN concept has been adopted and in Adelaide, a smaller, less densely populated Australian city, where similar compact and walkable neighbourhoods are proposed in urban plans [35]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Through improved service provision and accessibility, 20-min neighbourhoods (20MNs) aim to enable people to meet most of their daily (non-work) needs within 20 min from home. Oostenbach et al BMC Public Health (2022) 22:191 neighbourhoods (20MNs) [3, 6] This concept which originated in Portland (United States (US)) holds local accessibility of services and amenities as key to neighbourhood liveability [3]. Interest in 20MNs has grown in recent years, with cities such as Melbourne (Australia) [6, 7], Paris (France) [5], Edinburgh, (United Kingdom) [8], and Tempe (US) [4] incorporating similar concepts in their urban plans. Through improved service provision and accessibility, 20MNs aim to enable people to meet most of their daily (non-workrelated) needs within 20 min from home. Social, economic, and health benefits have been projected [7], it is unknown whether benefits of having a 20MN expand to behaviours such as food practices

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call