Is Gender “In-the-Wild” Inference Really a Solved Problem?

Abstract

Soft biometrics analysis is seen as an important research topic, given its relevance to various applications. However, even though it is frequently seen as a solved task, it can still be very hard to perform in wild conditions, under varying image conditions, uncooperative poses, and occlusions. Considering the <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">gender</i> trait as our topic of study, we report an extensive analysis of the feasibility of its inference regarding image (resolution, luminosity, and blurriness) and subject-based features (face and body keypoints confidence). Using three state-of-the-art datasets (PETA, PA-100K, RAP) and five Person Attribute Recognition models, we correlate feature analysis with gender inference accuracy using the Shapley value, enabling us to perceive the importance of each image/subject-based feature. Furthermore, we analyze face-based gender inference and assess the pose effect on it. Our results suggest that: 1) image-based features are more influential for low-quality data; 2) an increase in image quality translates into higher subject-based feature importance; 3) face-based gender inference accuracy correlates with image quality increase; and 4) subjects’ frontal pose promotes an implicit attention towards the face. The reported results are seen as a basis for subsequent developments of inference approaches in uncontrolled outdoor environments, which typically correspond to visual surveillance conditions.