Abstract

Exercise is receiving substantial and increasing attention as a potential treatment for depression. Despite the many positive meta-analytical findings and recommendations of some guidelines to incorporate exercise as a treatment for depression (National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2009), most clinical trials have significant methodological flaws that limit the generalizability of their findings (Daley, 2008; Rethorst et al., 2009). Furthermore, recent meta-analyses show that, when only robust clinical trials are included, the effects of exercise are “moderate at best” or statistically insignificant (Rimer et al., 2012).

Highlights

  • Four recent, robust, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have failed to find any antidepressant effects of exercise: the DEMO (Krogh et al, 2009), DEMO II (Krogh et al, 2012), TReatment with Exercise Augmentation for Depression (TREAD) (Trivedi et al, 2011), and TREAD-UK (Chalder et al, 2012)

  • The authors concluded that exercise was as effective as placebo and had no biological antidepressant effects

  • After 8 months, physical activity was shown to be an ineffective and more costly strategy than conventional primary care assistance and resulted in a non-costeffective strategy according to willingnessto-pay thresholds

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Four recent, robust, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have failed to find any antidepressant effects of exercise: the DEMO (Krogh et al, 2009), DEMO II (Krogh et al, 2012), TReatment with Exercise Augmentation for Depression (TREAD) (Trivedi et al, 2011), and TREAD-UK (Chalder et al, 2012). The DEMO trial (Krogh et al, 2009) compared aerobic exercise, anaerobic exercise, and relaxation (control) groups; after 4 months of intervention, no differences in depressive symptoms, as assessed by the Hamilton scale for depression (HAM-D17) (Hamilton, 1967), were found between the groups. The DEMO II trial (Krogh et al, 2012) compared aerobic exercise and stretching (control) groups; after 3 months, the authors found reductions in HAM-D17 scores in both groups but failed to find differences between the groups.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.