Abstract
Aim: This paper aims to examine whether Evidence-based Medicine (EBM) is positivist and to consider the implications of the answer.Method The initial announcement of EBM in 1992 is used to ascertain the philosophy of EBM. The definition of positivism is taken from Ian Hacking. The paper draws on Greaves for a discussion of whether medicine can be concentrated into a positivistic model. Particular attention is given to a landmark paper on EBM philosophy published in 2009.Results: The defence against the charge of positivism is noted. Even so, it is concluded that EBM is positivist. It emphasises observation, verification and method over theory. Yet allopathy distinguishes itself from complementary and alternative approaches to healing by holding to scientific theory.Conclusion: EBM is positivist. In consequence, EBM is too limited to be synonymous with or quivalent to good medicine or singulary to inform an effective health care, which involves many dimensions, including interpersonal/social and philosophical dimensions. EBM gives no account of symbolism in medicine. Complaining about lack of attention to the evidence, it scarcely adjusts the ideal medical model to what doctors actually use, where there is less certainty and control over variables.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: The International Journal of Person Centered Medicine
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
