Is Cys(MTSL) the Best α-Amino Acid Residue to Electron Spin Labeling of Synthetically Accessible Peptide Molecules with Nitroxides?

Abstract

Electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy, particularly its pulse technique double electron–electron resonance (DEER) (also termed PELDOR), is rapidly becoming an extremely useful tool for the experimental determination of side chain-to-side chain distances between free radicals in molecules fundamental for life, such as polypeptides. Among appropriate probes, the most popular are undoubtedly nitroxide electron spin labels. In this context, suitable biosynthetically derived, helical regions of proteins, along with synthetic peptides with amphiphilic properties and antibacterial activities, are the most extensively investigated compounds. A strict requirement for a precise distance measurement has been identified in a minimal dynamic flexibility of the two nitroxide-bearing α-amino acid side chains. To this end, in this study, we have experimentally compared in detail the side-chain mobility properties of the two currently most widely utilized residues, namely, Cys(MTSL) and 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl-4-amino-4-carboxylic acid (TOAC). In particular, two double-labeled, chemically synthesized 20-mer peptide molecules have been adopted as appropriate templates for our investigation on the determination of the model intramolecular separations. These double-Cys(MTSL) and double-TOAC compounds are both analogues of the almost completely rigid backbone peptide ruler which we have envisaged and 3D structurally analyzed as our original, unlabeled compound. Here, we have clearly found that the TOAC side-chain labels are largely more 3D structurally restricted than the MTSL labels. From this result, we conclude that the TOAC residue offers more precise information than the Cys(MTSL) residue on the side chain-to-side chain distance distribution in synthetically accessible peptide molecules.