Abstract
The paper challenges the idea that neoclassical economics has demonstrated competition’s efficiency. It does so by retracing the history of Pareto’s criterion (in general equilibrium and in modern neoclassical economics), showing that it is only after a few shifts and transformations that it became an “efficiency” criterion while it was never called that in Pareto’s work. Widespread belief that competition is efficient is rather the result of ideology than of rigorous neoclassical demonstration. JEL Classification: B13, B21, P16
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
