Abstract

Background and aimWhether chemotherapy can improve the prognosis of invasive intraductal papillary-mucinous carcinoma (IPMC) still remains unclear. The aim of this study is to observe the difference in survival time of patients with invasive IPMC receiving or not receiving chemotherapy. Methods117 patients with invasive IPMC were included in The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. These patients were subsequently divided into two subgroups according to whether they received chemotherapy or not: the non-chemotherapy group (patients who did not receivechemotherapy, N = 58), the chemotherapy group (patients who received chemotherapy, N = 59). The overall survival (OS) and cancer specific survival (CSS) of two treatment groups were evaluated. ResultsBefore adjusting for pathology grade, the Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the difference of survival time is not significant between non-chemotherapy group and chemotherapy group (P > 0.05), but the land-mark analysis showed that short-term death risk of the chemotherapy group is significantly lower than non-chemotherapy group (P < 0.05). After adjust the pathology grade, survival time of the chemotherapy group is significantly longer than non-chemotherapy group (P < 0.05). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression showed that chemotherapy was an independent prognostic protective factor for invasive IPMC (P < 0.05). Land-mark analysis showed that short-term death risk of the chemotherapy group is significantly lower than non-chemotherapy group in N1-N2 subgroup (P < 0.05). ConclusionChemotherapy is an independent protective factor IPMC, especially reducing the risk of short-term death for IPMC patients with lymph node metastasis.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.