Is cervical sagittal alignment associated with pain and disability in myofascial pain syndrome?: A cross-sectional study

Abstract

ObjectiveTo elucidate the role of cervical sagittal alignment in the pathophysiology of cervical myofascial pain syndrome(MFPS) and its impact on pain levels and disability status among patients. MethodsThis prospective cross-sectional study included participants aged 18–64 years experiencing neck pain for more than 3 months and diagnosed with MFPS. Cervical sagittal parameters (C0–2 cervical lordosis(CL) angle, C2–7 CL angle, cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), T1 slope, T1 slope minus CL mismatch(T1S-CL), and cervical tilt) were measured using Surgimap software by an expert physiatrist. Pain levels were assessed using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale(NRS), and neck disability was evaluated using the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire(NBQ). ResultsOut of 200 initially assessed participants with cervical MFPS, 133 were included after excluding ineligible individuals. The mean age of the participants was 35.3±8.2 years. Participants categorized by pain severity (moderate vs. severe) showed no significant differences in cervical range of motion, C0–2 angle, cSVA, T1 slope and T1S-CL. However, significant differences were observed in C2–7 angle (p=0.008), cervical tilt (p=0.006), and NBQ scores (p<0.001) between the two pain severity groups. Grouping based on T1S-CL compliance showed no significant differences in pain and disability effects. Correlation analysis revealed weak negative correlations between pain levels and C2–7 Cobb angle (p=0.009, r=0.226) as well as cervical tilt (p=0.005, r=0.243). No correlations were found between cervical sagittal parameters and NBQ scores. ConclusionsDecreased C2–7 CL angle and cervical tilt angle are associated with increased pain levels; however, cervical sagittal alignment was not found to be associated with disability.