Abstract
Common names are non-specific by definition, and scientists should naturally avoid placing strict rules on their usage. There are many examples of common names applying to numerous, often only distantly related taxa, yet the term ‘kelp’ is increasingly being used to refer solely to members of the macroalgal order Laminariales, and some scientists now assert that any other use is incorrect. A brief examination of the word's etymology, however, demonstrates that kelp can with equal validity also refer to non-laminarialean taxa. Many people do still use the word ‘kelp’ in its broader sense, and these conflicting definitions of the word can lead to confusion and miscommunication between scientists and the general public. This review demonstrates that the definition of ‘kelp’ should remain relaxed, in accordance with its role as a common name.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.