Abstract

Scenarios and models of the future of HE range from institutional models and ideals to sectorial scenarios and visions of a global, virtual conglomeration controlled by private sector publishing houses rather than HE as a public good. This paper questions the 12 principles that underpin the Bologna process ministerial declarations in terms of their long term sustainability within the HE sector. Firstly are the issues around the Academe itself: academic freedom, institutional autonomy, academic values and comparability/compatibility. Second are the issues that question the purpose of HE: education as a public good, as a public responsibility, democratic principles, equity and diversity. Finally are the issues surrounding key players with a voice influencing the debate: the participation of stakeholders, issues of accountability, and sustainable development for the good of the planet. By exploring the issues that will influence these three areas in the next 25 years, this paper questions the sustainability of the Bologna process itself, and whether, despite its good intentions at the outset, it could lead to a longer term future that nobody within the public or HE sector would desire. The paper concludes by identifying the areas that need reconsideration in the next phase of the Bologna Process, as the various stakeholders outline possible, probable and preferred models for the future.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.