Energy Research & Social Science | VOL. 60
Read

Is bio-energy carbon capture and storage (BECCS) feasible? The contested authority of integrated assessment modeling

Publication Date Feb 1, 2020

Abstract

Abstract How are novel energy, technology, and land-use systems strategies for limiting climate change judged to be ‘feasible’? Controversy has arisen around the research community behind integrated assessment modeling (IAM) scenarios used in the Assessment Reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. This regards the role played by an unproven component in projected energy systems—a coupling of bioenergy generation with carbon capture and storage techniques (BECCS)—that allows IAMs to achieve ambitious temperature targets since adopted by the Paris Agreement. We engage members of the IAM community and a multidisciplinary range of critical experts to interrogate how the ‘feasibility’ of BECCS—or other novel technologies—is assessed within modeling, and use ‘boundary work’ to show how the kind of expertise—and by extension, the authority—held by the IAM community is being challenged. We find that the competing judgments of BECCS's feasibility, between the IAM community and its critics, reflect and reinforce different understandings of the freedom of scientific inquiry, the mutual influences of science and policy, the shape of science communication, and the necessity of reform. We ask what these claims signal for future activity in this space, and conclude with a call for ‘reflexive’ modeling approaches to bridge perspectives.

Concepts

Bio-energy Carbon Capture And Storage Integrated Assessment Modeling Boundary Work Bio-energy Carbon Capture Kind Of Expertise Necessity Of Reform Carbon Capture Paris Agreement Storage Techniques Carbon Capture Techniques

Round-ups are the summaries of handpicked papers around trending topics published every week. These would enable you to scan through a collection of papers and decide if the paper is relevant to you before actually investing time into reading it.

Coronavirus Research Articles published between Sep 26, 2022 to Oct 02, 2022

R DiscoveryOct 03, 2022
R DiscoveryArticles Included:  5

Introduction: Test solutions (Biotrue, renu Advanced [Bausch and Lomb], ACUVUE RevitaLens [Johnson and Johnson Vision], cleadew [Ophtecs corp.] or AOS...

Read More

Good health Research Articles published between Sep 26, 2022 to Oct 02, 2022

R DiscoveryOct 03, 2022
R DiscoveryArticles Included:  2

Patient and public involvement in health care is considered indispensable in the way we conduct daily pediatric neurology practice, and in the develop...

Read More

Quality Of Education Research Articles published between Sep 26, 2022 to Oct 02, 2022

R DiscoveryOct 03, 2022
R DiscoveryArticles Included:  5

Ingenta is not the publisher of the publication content on this website. The responsibility for the publication content rests with the publishers prov...

Read More

Gender Equality Research Articles published between Sep 26, 2022 to Oct 02, 2022

R DiscoveryOct 03, 2022
R DiscoveryArticles Included:  3

Introduction: As of early March 2022, the COVID-19 pandemic has killed more 5.9 million people worldwide, and infected more than 437 million.

Read More

Coronavirus Pandemic

You can also read COVID related content on R COVID-19

R ProductsCOVID-19

ONE PROBLEM . ONE PURPOSE . ONE PLACE

Creating the world’s largest AI-driven & human-curated collection of research, news, expert recommendations and educational resources on COVID-19

COVID-19 Dashboard

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on “as is” basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The Copyright Law.