Abstract
Despite measures taken by firms to prevent fraud, it has been found in recent studies that losses derived from fraudulent activities are increasing on a global basis. International standards on auditing do not define which analytical approaches and technological tools to be used in performing audit. Decisions are left on the auditor’s judgment. Auditors try to use digital techniques to deal with mass data sets generated by firms. Academic research may mislead practitioners as controversial outcomes exist in literature concerning empirical research. Benford’s Law (BL) is one of the methods used frequently in digital analysis. Although some researchers defend the use of BL in audit, especially in fraud detection, this paper disputes its effectiveness for expense cycle. Different firm’s data are tested to conclude that the use of BL is not appropriate for expense items. The reasons of this deficiency are explained in this paper.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
