Abstract

Opposing forces influence assortative mating so that one seeks a similar mate while at the same time avoiding inbreeding with close relatives. Thus, mate choice may be a balancing of phenotypic similarity and dissimilarity between partners. In the present study, we assessed the role of resemblance to Self’s facial traits in judgments of physical attractiveness. Participants chose the most attractive face image of their romantic partner among several variants, where the faces were morphed so as to include only 22% of another face. Participants distinctly preferred a “Self-based morph” (i.e., their partner’s face with a small amount of Self’s face blended into it) to other morphed images. The Self-based morph was also preferred to the morph of their partner’s face blended with the partner’s same-sex “prototype”, although the latter face was (“objectively”) judged more attractive by other individuals. When ranking morphs differing in level of amalgamation (i.e., 11% vs. 22% vs. 33%) of another face, the 22% was chosen consistently as the preferred morph and, in particular, when Self was blended in the partner’s face. A forced-choice signal-detection paradigm showed that the effect of self-resemblance operated at an unconscious level, since the same participants were unable to detect the presence of their own faces in the above morphs. We concluded that individuals, if given the opportunity, seek to promote “positive assortment” for Self’s phenotype, especially when the level of similarity approaches an optimal point that is similar to Self without causing a conscious acknowledgment of the similarity.

Highlights

  • Current psychological research on human attractiveness has replaced the relativistic belief that ‘‘beauty is in the eye of the beholder’’ with a universalistic one

  • Averageness, symmetry, and sexual dimorphisms of facial proportions are key features that serve the role of indicators for biologically relevant traits

  • Both averageness and symmetry would seem to be sought by males and females, sexual dimorphisms reflect each sex’s differing investments in reproduction

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Current psychological research on human attractiveness has replaced the relativistic belief that ‘‘beauty is in the eye of the beholder’’ with a universalistic one. Faces are known to play a special role in humans and there is a consensus that babies are already equipped with inborn information about the perceptual structure of faces and possess mechanisms that guide a preference for face-like patterns and facilitates the learning of facial identities at an early age [8]. For both sexes, general physical attractiveness is better predicted by ratings of facial attractiveness than by ratings of body images [9], [10]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.