Abstract
The conformational preference for different ϕ/Ψ backbone torsion angles is a key determinant of peptide and protein secondary structure. Often, dipeptides are used as models for understanding protein backbone dynamics and to derive force field parameters. Here, the question is examined to what extent the conformational preferences in dipeptides reflect the backbone dynamics in polypeptides and proteins and to what extent an alanine dipeptide-based backbone torsion parametrization can lead to accurate reproduction of amino acid dependent ϕ/Ψ preferences in protein structures. Results from a comparison of the analysis of Protein Data Bank (PDB) structures with long simulations of selected proteins and amino acid dipeptides suggest that a common alanine dipeptide-based torsion potential does in fact lead to excellent agreement between protein simulations and PDB structures. At the same time, the ϕ/Ψ preferences in the dipeptides are significantly different, suggesting that dipeptides are not good model systems for studying protein backbone dynamics.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.