Abstract

BackgroundThe efficacy and benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for patients with gastric cancer pT3N0M0 remain controversial.MethodsWe prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed 235 patients with pT3N0M0 gastric cancer who underwent radical resection between February 2010 and January 2016. Patients were divided into two groups: the surgery-alone (SA) group (n = 82) and the AC group (n = 153). We analyzed the effects of AC on the overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS), and the relationship between the number of chemotherapy cycles (CC) and recurrence rate (RR).ResultsThe 5-year OS and RFS of the participants were 80.9% and 87.7%, respectively, and those in the AC group were significantly higher than those in the SA group (86.9% vs. 69.5%, p = 0.003). The RFS of the AC and SA groups were 88.9% and 85.4%, respectively; the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.35). The independent risk factors affecting the OS were perineural invasion-positive (PNI+) (HR = 2.64, 95%CI: 1.45–4.82, p = 0.003) and age ≥ 65 years (HR = 2.58, 95%CI: 1.39–4.8, p = 0.003). The independent risk factor affecting the RFS was also PNI+ (HR3.11; 95%CI: 1.48–6.54, p = 0.003). Stratified analysis revealed that postoperative AC can significantly improve the OS of PNI+ patients (AC group versus SA group: 84.1% vs. 45.5%, p = 0.001) and RFS (86.4% vs. 63.6%, p = 0.017). However, perineural invasion negative (PNI-) patients did not show the same results (p = 0.13 and p = 0.48, respectively). According to the number of CC, divided into CC < 3 groups and CC ≥ 3 groups, the cumulative RR in the CC ≥ 3 group of patients with PNI+ was significantly lower than that of the CC < 3 group (7.4% vs. 28.2%, p = 0.037).ConclusionFor pT3N0M0 gastric cancer patients with PNI+, at least three cycles of postoperative AC can significantly reduce the overall RR. This finding should be verified by using large external sample data.

Highlights

  • Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for gastric cancer patients with postoperative pathological stages II and III has become widely accepted [1]

  • All patients underwent gastrectomy according to different tumor locations, and patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, synchronous tumors, or incomplete pathological diagnoses were excluded from the study (Figure 1)

  • Perineural invasion was defined as hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining in paraffin-embedded specimens of gastric cancer revealing the infiltration of tumor cells to the nerve bundle or perineurium

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for gastric cancer patients with postoperative pathological stages II and III has become widely accepted [1]. The use of chemotherapy in patients with PT3N0M0 [stage IIA, according to the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)] is still controversial in the guidelines of many Asian countries. This may be due to the exclusion of patients with pT3N0M0 stage in the Adjuvant Chemotherapy Trial of S-1 for Gastric Cancer (ATCS-GC) in Japan, which explored the standard treatment scheme for stages II and III gastric cancer after surgery. The efficacy and benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for patients with gastric cancer pT3N0M0 remain controversial

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call