Is a species distribution model output reliable to test niche limitation at the northern range limit of a Pacific coastal dune plant?

Abstract

Jacqueline Grubel* and Christopher G. Eckert (Faculty Supporter)
 It is widely thought that the size, shape and location of a species’ geographical distribution are a spatial expression of its realized niche, and this assumption is central to evolutionary biology, biogeography and conservation. Yet, the hypothesis that geographical range limits are niche limits is not well supported by experimental translocations of species beyond their range limits. Beyond range populations often exhibit fitness high enough for self-replacement. In contrast, environmental niche models based on bioclimatic data often suggest a decline in habitat suitability beyond range limits, thereby supporting niche limitation. However very few studies have evaluated whether species distribution models (SDMs) accurately predict the viability of populations in nature, and scant results to date are not supportive. Long-term transplant with the short-lived, Pacific costal dune endemic plant Camissoniopsis cheiranthifolia (Onagraceae) suggest that populations are viable beyond the northern range limit over multiple generations. We constructed an SDM based on a large range-wide database of species records plus standard bioclimatic variables and substrate type. We also included sea surface temperature, which greatly modifies the climate of dune habitat. Preliminary results suggest that our SDM reliably predicts the fitness of experimental populations. However, both approaches indicate that something other than niche limitation enforces the northern range limit of this species. Results from this well-studied dune plant suggest that range limitation via constraints on dispersal may play an important role in limiting northern range expansion.