Abstract
This paper reproduces in detail the debate ‘pro-and-con’ regarding the use of 100% oxygen or room air in the resuscitation of the asphyxiated newly born infants, celebrated in Oslo at the 2002 European Association of Perinatal Medicine (EAPM) meeting, in which both co-authors participated as featured speakers. The authors describe their arguments which are based on medical tradition, clinical experience, basic science, and prospective randomized and pseudo-randomized clinical studies that have been reported in the past years. Both authors stress the importance of the long-term consequences of the use of high oxygen concentrations in the perinatal period and conclude that there is a need for further research in the way of ample prospective randomized clinical trials.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
