Abstract

Abstract2,4‐Diamino‐6‐(p‐aminophenethyl)pyrimidines with a 5‐phenylbutyl (XIX) and 5‐(p‐chlorophenyl) (VIII) substituent were synthesized by condensation of the corresponding pyrimidine‐6‐carboxaldehydes (XVI, X) with the Wittig reagent derived from p‐nitro‐benzyl bromide, followed by catalytic hydrogenation. Selective bromoacetylation of VIII and XIX afforded the candidate active‐site‐directed irreversible inhibitors of dihydrofolic reductase, namely, 6‐(p‐bromoacetamidophenethyl)‐2,4‐diaminopyrimidine with a 5‐(p‐chlorophenyl)‐ (IV) and 5‐phenylbutyl‐ (III) substituents. Although III and IV were excellent reversible inhibitors of dihydrofolic reductase, neither showed any inactivation of the enzyme; in contrast, the corresponding 2‐amino‐6‐(p‐bromoacetamidophenethyl)‐5‐phenylbutyl‐4‐pyrimidinol (II) ‐ which differs from III only in the 4‐substituent (NH2 vs. OH) ‐ was an excellent active‐site‐directed irreversible inhibitor of dihydrofolic reductase, but II was a poor reversible inhibitor. Thus the conformations of II and III are most probably different when complexed to dihydrofolic reductase.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.