Abstract
This paper develops the metaphysical hypothesis that there are irreducibly collective pluralities, pluralities of objects that do not have a singular object among them. A way to formulate this hypothesis using plural quantification will be proposed and the coherence of irreducibly collective existence will be defended. Furthermore, irreducibly collective existence will be shown to allow for bottomless scenarios that do not involve things standing in relations of parthood. This will create logical space for an anti-atomistic form of mereological nihilism.
Highlights
Are there some things that form the bottom of reality or is the world bottomless? This question is often framed in terms of mereology
The first premise of the argument follows from every reasonable definition of nihilism
The second premise seems undeniable when one thinks of bottomlessness in terms of mereology
Summary
Are there some things that form the bottom of reality or is the world bottomless? This question is often framed in terms of mereology. Is every thing made of atoms, objects that have no proper parts? Are there gunky objects, objects such that every part of them has a proper part?1 From the perspective of the mereologist, a scenario is bottomless just in case there is nothing (for an empty scenario does not seem to have a bottom) or there is a thing that is not an atom or composed of atoms. It should be noted that this paper exclusively deals with what one might call objectual bottomlessness. Propertybottomlessness is not the topic of this paper.. Framing the question of whether the world has a bottom in terms of mereology has a downside for mereological nihilists, philosophers who hold that no object is a proper
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.