Iron surveillance and management in gastrointestinal oncology patients: A national survey of physician practice.

Abstract

e13644 Background: In 2018, there were an estimated 4.8 million new cases of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers worldwide and 3.4 million related deaths. Iron deficiency (ID) is a frequent complication of GI malignancy that eventually manifests as iron deficiency anemia (IDA). Early recognition and treatment of ID/IDA in GI oncology patients is an important aspect of care. Traditional serum ferritin monitoring and oral iron supplementation hold limited diagnostic and therapeutic value in this population as it may be falsely elevated and confounded by poor absorption and blood loss, respectively. Therefore, we conducted a survey of Canadian physicians to assess disparities in IDA surveillance and management practices in GI cancer patients. Methods: From February 2020 to September 2021, a 20-question electronic survey was sent to Canadian medical oncologists (MO), surgical oncologists (SO), and gastroenterologists (GE). The survey collected information on four domains: demographics, screening practices, treatment practices, and knowledge of the latest guidelines of ID/IDA. Analysis was conducted using descriptive statistics. Results: A total of 108 (55 GE, 19 SO, and 34 MO) of the 872 (12.4%) invited physicians completed the survey. A greater proportion of GE (70.9% compared to 36.8% of SO, and 26.5% of MO) measured baseline iron parameters. Of these, a slight trend of iron parameters were being measured mainly at initial consult (61.5% of GE, 85.7% of SO, and 44.4% of MO), with little continuing surveillance throughout treatment course. Most physicians who measured iron parameters relied on ferritin mainly (82.1% of GE, 100% of SO), while MO were evenly distributed in their evaluation of ferritin (88.9%), serum iron (100%), total iron binding capacity (100%) and iron saturation (88.9%). The majority supplemented iron if ID/IDA was identified prior to systemic/surgical oncologic treatment (94.2% of GE, 85.7% SO, and 66.7% of MO). Of these, parenteral iron was the preferred modality for SO (85.7%), while oral iron was preferred among GE (82.8%) and MO (55.6%). The majority of physicians (81.3%) were not aware of the ASH/ASCO guidelines regarding the use of erythropoiesis stimulating agents in conjunction with parenteral iron supplementation for treatment anemia in this setting (92% of GE, 66.7% of SO, and 80.9% of MO). Conclusions: Results from this Canadian survey suggests a disparity in practice pattern for IDA management between different specialties caring for GI oncology patients. Moreover, there appears to be a gap in knowledge and thus a gap in care surrounding evidence-based IDA management principles which may be contributing to poor clinical outcomes. Focused knowledge translation and exchange efforts are required to improve treatment of ID/IDA in patients with GI cancer nationally.