Abstract

1. IntroductionDue to the rapid growth in global energy consumption, it is imperative to improve the efficiency of electrical machines and other electrical devices. Iron loss is a crucial part of electrical machines, and has received increasing attention in the past few years. It is significant for both optimizing electrical machine design and improving thermal efficiency. Over the years, several iron loss models have been developed, such as the loss separation models [1] and various hysteresis models [2]. In order to evaluate the iron loss, the most traditional way is to analyze the machine using finite element method (FEM), and calculate the iron loss employing a loss separation model. However, it is deficient, especially when dealing with inverter-fed electrical machines, in which higher-order harmonics exist. In some cases, the estimation error exceeds one hundred percent [3], which is critical for iron loss prediction. On the other hand, in order to precisely describe the materials properties, several hysteresis models are developed. One benefit of hysteresis models is that the iron loss can be directly obtained if the B-H hysteresis loops are known.This paper introduces an iron loss estimation method based on the loss surface (LS) hysteresis model and has applied it on several specimens. The verification process is shown in Fig. 1. The LS hysteresis model is constructed based on the B-H hysteresis loops measured from a toroidal specimen laminated of non-oriented electrical steel sheets. A C-type specimen constructed by the same material is taken as the test object, and is analyzed using the finite element method. The obtained field results combined with the LS hysteresis model are used for iron loss calculation. The calculation results are compared with measured ones. The verification is carried on for both sinusoidal and non-sinusoidal cases.2. The Proposed ProcedureAs the iron loss can be calculated directly from the integral of the hysteresis loop without the empirical values. Therefore, it is important to get the magnetic field intensity (H) from the flux density (B) and its derivative(dB/dt). The method begins with the measurement of the B-H hysteresis loops, which is performed on a toroidal specimen according to the International Standard IEC 60404-6 [4]. A primary winding is used for the excitation, and another winding is the measuring coil. The B-H hysteresis loops under different magnetic flux density magnitudes Bm have been measured to demonstrate the material behavior more precisely. The LS model, therefore, can be represented by the function between the magnetic field intensity(H) and the flux density (B) and its derivative (dB/dt) and its maximum value (Bm).The calculated object is first performed field analysis by using finite element method. The magnetic flux density distribution can be computed in all elements, which is also taken as the input of the LS model. Combined the derivative of magnetic flux density (dB/dt) and the magnitude Bm, the corresponding magnetic field intensity (H) can be obtained, therefore, the B-H hysteresis loops for arbitrary waveforms can be construed, from which iron loss can be calculated.3. VerificationFirst, a C-type specimen with the same material is manufactured to verify the proposed procedure, as shown in Fig. 1. In order to check the LS hysteresis modeling accuracy, a magnetic flux density with 0.8T amplitude and 50Hz fundamental frequency, combined with 35% of the third harmonic with a phase shift of 90°is taken as the input, and the magnetic field intensity and hysteresis loops are shown in Fig. 2. The modeled results match well with measured ones. The iron loss of the test C-type specimen is calculated by using both the proposed method and the loss separation model. The measured iron loss is 1.699W, and for the proposed method, the calculated iron loss is 1.530W, whereas for the loss separation models, the calculated iron loss is 1.282W.4. ConclusionThe proposed iron loss calculation procedure based on the LS hysteresis model has been developed and the verification of a C-type specimen has been done. Compared with actual measured results, the proposed iron loss calculation method is more accurate than loss separation model. Verification and analysis on more topologies will be discussed in the full paper. **

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call