Abstract

Abstract. Global significance of iron (Fe) and aluminum (Al) for the storage of organic matter (OM) in soils and surface sediments is increasingly recognized. Yet specific metal phases involved or the mechanism behind metal–OM correlations frequently shown across soils remain unclear. We identified the allocation of major metal phases and OM to density fractions using 23 soil samples from five climate zones and five soil orders (Andisols, Spodosols, Inceptisols, Mollisols, Ultisols) from Asia and North America, including several subsurface horizons and both natural and managed soils. Each soil was separated into four to seven density fractions using sodium polytungstate with mechanical shaking, followed by the sequential extraction of each fraction with pyrophosphate (PP), acid oxalate (OX), and finally dithionite–citrate (DC) to estimate pedogenic metal phases of different solubility and crystallinity. The concentrations of Fe and Al (per fraction) extracted by each of the three reagents were generally higher in meso-density fractions (1.8–2.4 g cm−3) than in the lower- or higher-density fractions, showing a unique unimodal pattern along the particle density gradient for each soil. Across the studied soils, the maximum metal concentrations were always at the meso-density range within which PP-extractable metals peaked at 0.3–0.4 g cm−3 lower-density range relative to OX- and DC-extractable metals. Meso-density fractions, consisting largely of aggregated clusters based on SEM observation, accounted for on average 56 %–70 % of total extractable metals and OM present in these soils. The OM in meso-density fractions showed a 2–23 unit lower C : N ratio than the lowest-density fraction of the respective soil and thus appeared microbially processed relative to the original plant material. The amounts of PP- and OX-extractable metals correlated positively with co-dissolved C across the soils and, to some extent, across the density fractions within each soil. These results led to a hypothesis which involves two distinct levels of organo-metal interaction: (1) the formation of OM-rich, mixed metal phases with fixed OM : metal stoichiometry followed by (2) the development of meso-density microaggregates via “gluing” action of these organo-metallic phases by entraining other organic and mineral particles such as phyllosilicate clays. Given that OM is mainly located in meso-density fractions, a soil's capacity to protect OM may be controlled by the balance of three processes: (i) microbial processing of plant-derived OM, (ii) dissolution of metals, and (iii) the synthesis of organo-metallic phases and their association with clays to form meso-density microaggregates. The current hypothesis may help to fill the gap between well-studied molecular-scale interaction (e.g., OM adsorption on mineral surface, coprecipitation) and larger-scale processes such as aggregation, C accrual, and pedogenesis.

Highlights

  • Organic matter (OM) stored in soil plays a fundamental role in ecosystem functioning through the storage of carbon (C) and nutrients, improvement of aeration and water-holding capacity, and plant productivity and biogeochemical cycling

  • While the recovery of the metals assessed by PP, OX, and DC sequential extractions was generally good, the variation among the soils was larger (Table 2), as some soil samples and metal phases showed poor recoveries

  • The metals released by PP, OX, and DC extractions only roughly correspond to specific metal phases present in the soil as these extractions are not highly selective (Parfitt, 2009; Rennert, 2019)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Organic matter (OM) stored in soil plays a fundamental role in ecosystem functioning through the storage of carbon (C) and nutrients, improvement of aeration and water-holding capacity, and plant productivity and biogeochemical cycling. Changes in soil OM have a significant impact on future climate as soil represents the largest terrestrial C pool. Soil OM stability is strongly controlled by its association with soil minerals via chemical interaction and physical aggregation (Lehmann and Kleber, 2015; Sollins et al, 1996). The mineral parameters often used to estimate soil’s protective capacity are clay content (< 2 μm) or clay plus silt content (< 20 μm) of soils as they often correlate with soil OM contents, and these small-sized minerals tend to have a high surface area to adsorb OM (Six et al, 2002, and the references therein). Used mathematical models to predict soil C changes use these parameters to slow down OM turnover and to increase its storage (Coleman and Jenkinson, 1996; Parton et al, 1987; Wieder et al, 2015)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call