Iron Age ‘Currency Bars’: The Archaeological and Social Context

Abstract

It will be proposed that the common utilitarian or functional explanation for the deposition of currency bars is too simple and should be amended to allow greater emphasis on the social context of the acts of production and deposition. Research indicates that currency bars—both as single finds and as hoards—occur in a limited range of archaeological contexts. It would appear that the act of deposition occurred under strict control and that the majority of currency bars were deposited as part of acts of ritual. The archaeological contexts of the three major types of currency bar are considered. All three types of currency bar—spit-shaped, sword-shaped, and plough-share—occur in similar contexts. Two major types of context are identified and in turn these define at least two distinct regions in the distribution of the bars. One zone is characterized by the deposition of the bars in varying sized hoards, but almost always in close relationship to a hill-fort rampart or a settlement boundary ditch. This may relate to rituals which defined the boundary of the settlement area of the family or community group. The analysis raises questions concerning the social and ritual significance of the boundaries which surrounded iron age hill forts and settlements. In contrast, a second zone is characterized by the deposition of currency bars in a range of natural locations (including bogs, rivers, caves, and rocky outcrops) which constitute the more standard contexts of ritual deposition for the British Bronze Age and Iron Age. These contexts may relate to rituals that defined boundaries at a range of scales; from those between social groups to tribal boundaries and even the boundaries of Britain.