Abstract

The Gluhite kamani Thracian rock-cut complex in the Eastern Rhodopes Mountain is famous with its more than 500 rock niches carved in the rock at heights up to 20 m. Continuous habitation starting from the final Chalcolithic (the second quarter of the 4th millenium BCE) until the Late Classical – Early Hellenistic period (late 5th – 4th century BCE) provides unique opportunity for studying diachronic changes in pottery production and use. In this contribution, systematic analysis of a collection of 135 ceramic sherds from five archaeological periods at the site was carried out using a combined mineral magnetic and geochemical approach. Magnetic susceptibility (χ), frequency-dependent magnetic susceptibility (χfd%) and firing temperature (Tfire), determined using the magnetic susceptibility method, were combined with data from elemental XRF analyses. Thermomagnetic measurements, employed for identification of magnetic minerals revealed the dominant presence of (titano)magnetite with low Ti-content and/or a fraction of single-domain magnetite and in few cases hematite. Although varying in a wide range, median χ values of ceramic sherds from the Early Iron Age (EIA) periods show similar distribution, while for Late Iron Age (LIA) with the introduction of the wheel-thrown pottery, χ values are higher, presumably due to decreased amount of silica-rich clastics in the clay. Concurrently, χfd% values decrease in ceramics from the LIA, indicating predominant presence of stable single-domain magnetite in the iron oxide composition of the ceramics. Firing temperatures (Tfire) estimations display a systematic pattern of two groups – higher (Tfire between 760 and 800 °C) and lower (Tfire ∼ 400–––600 °C). During the EIA periods both Tfire groups are present, characterized by systematic gradual decrease of the median value of the low Tfire when going from EIA1 towards the EIA2. Wheel-thrown pottery from the LIA show low Tfire ∼ 400 °C only. Based on the differences in thermomagnetic properties of ceramics, their magnetic parameters and Tfire estimates, two possible hypotheses are suggested to explain the observed changes in EIA ceramic characteristics: i) utilization of two differently sourced clay materials (illite-dominated and montmorillonite-dominated) for production of ceramics fired at higher and lower temperatures, respectively; and ii) utilization of one raw clay source, while using two firing regimes – firing at higher temperature for prolonged time, and fast firing to high temperature with successive stage of longer firing at lower temperature. Differences in thermomagnetic properties of wheel-thrown pottery from the LIA period leads to the assumption for utilization of diverse clay source for their production, as compared clay sources for the Early Iron Age periods.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call