Abstract

Irish farming households in Eastern Canada during postfamine period (1861-1871) are used as basis for a theoretical discussion of domestic production and family size. The purpose here is to extend discussion of Chayanov (1966) model of peasant economies, and offer modifications of this model based on empirical variations in Irish Canadian household composition, dependency ratios, and overall farm size. This article suggests that topic of choice and assumption of risk be made a more explicit part of Chayanov analysis, since farmers' decisions regarding productive capacity are apt to be made on a more holistic view of a farm's assets, and not just on basis of cultivated acreage per worker. (Irish Canadian households, domestic production, family composition, Chayanov model) ********** On subject of farm performance, or what Sahlins (1971) referred to as intensity of domestic production, previous studies by Kane (1968) and Symes (1972) have raised several important substantive issues concerning Irish households that have not yet been adequately resolved. (2) Kane (1968), for example, draws comparisons between rural households in southwestern Donegal and those of an Irish-American community in Ohio. Such studies of transcontinental relationships in Irish families are a valuable addition to literature because they illuminate structural similarities and differences in Irish farming as adaptations to new ecological and social settings. Thus, farm performance can be understood in a transitional sense, as an adaptive process. Differences between Irish American and Donegal households affecting performance include kinship structures that serve as a central distributing point for services, minor economic aid, and exchange of goods (Kane 1968:254). Based on ethnographic research in Ballyferriter, southwest Ireland, Symes (1972:25) concluded that the most important variable is structure of family unit itself [and these] variations occur both through time and through space. Examples of these variations include decreases in household size due to depopulation, transitional or structural factors such as those resulting in a change from stem to nuclear families, and a growing scarcity of farm labor. All in all, a fairly rapid of household size during dispersal [resulting from emigration and moves to urban centers] and increasing age and diminishing aspirations of farmer, level of farm production may be expected to decline (Symes 1972:35). This article on Irish farming households of Renfrew County (Admaston Township) in eastern Canada differs from those just mentioned in some significant ways. First, based on Canadian census data from postfamine period of 1861-71 (Canada 1861, 1871), farm performance is explored in context of population expansion, rather than depopulation, as is case with most previous Irish studies. Theoretically, it is beneficial to study farming communities undergoing growth and expansion as a balance to a focus on those communities in decline. Second, longitudinal approach taken here, extending over a decade in same geographical area, illuminates extent to which variations in household size and composition affect farm performance. IRISH EMIGRATION TO CANADA Prior to cataclysmic Great Famine (1846-49) in Ireland, emigration to Canada varied considerably from one decade to another (Elliot 1988; Houston and Smyth 1990; MacKay 1990; Mannion 1974; and Moran 1994). Migration from Irish ports to British North America (Canada) between 1825 and 1845 reached a high of 40,977 individuals in 1831 and a low of 2,284 in 1838. Curiously, corresponding figures for Irish emigration to United States for this period are much lower, reaching a high, for example, of only 6,199 in 1842, and a low of 1,169 in 1838. Of course, sailing from an Irish port does not necessarily mean that individual migrant was actually Irish. …

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.