Abstract

Induction of interferon-alpha (IFNalpha) gene expression in virus-infected cells requires phosphorylation-induced activation of the transcription factors IRF3 and IRF7. However, the kinase(s) that targets these proteins has not been identified. Using a combined pharmacological and genetic approach, we found that none of the kinases tested was responsible for IRF phosphorylation in cells infected with Newcastle disease virus (NDV). Although the broad-spectrum kinase inhibitor staurosporine potently blocked IRF3 and -7 phosphorylation, inhibitors for protein kinase C, protein kinase A, MEK, SAPK, IKK, and protein kinase R (PKR) were without effect. Both IkappaB kinase and PKR have been implicated in IFN induction, but cells genetically deficient in IkappaB kinase, PKR, or the PKR-related genes PERK, IRE1, or GCN2 retained the ability to phosphorylate IRF7 and induce IFNalpha. Interestingly, PKR mutant cells were defective for response to double-stranded (ds) RNA but not to virus infection, suggesting that dsRNA is not the only activating viral component. Consistent with this notion, protein synthesis was required for IRF7 phosphorylation in virus-infected cells, and the kinetics of phosphorylation and viral protein production were similar. Despite evidence for a lack of involvement of dsRNA and PKR, vaccinia virus E3L protein, a dsRNA-binding protein capable of inhibiting PKR, was an effective IRF3 and -7 phosphorylation inhibitor. These results suggest that a novel cellular protein that is activated by viral products in addition to dsRNA and is sensitive to E3L inhibition is responsible for IRF activation and reveal a novel mechanism for the anti-IFN effect of E3L distinct from its inhibition of PKR.

Highlights

  • Induction of interferon-␣ (IFN␣) gene expression in virus-infected cells requires phosphorylation-induced activation of the transcription factors IRF3 and IRF7

  • While production of viral products such as double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) play a role in activation of IKK and possibly of Jun kinase (JNK) [12], the data reported here suggest that additional signals stimulate phosphorylation of IRF3 and IRF7, essential events in induction of the protective IFN response

  • While protein kinase R (PKR)-mutant cells were defective in responses to dsRNA, they retained responsiveness to viral infection, demonstrating that infection provided additional signals beyond dsRNA

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Induction of interferon-␣ (IFN␣) gene expression in virus-infected cells requires phosphorylation-induced activation of the transcription factors IRF3 and IRF7. PKR mutant cells were defective for response to double-stranded (ds) RNA but not to virus infection, suggesting that dsRNA is not the only activating viral component. Despite evidence for a lack of involvement of dsRNA and PKR, vaccinia virus E3L protein, a dsRNA-binding protein capable of inhibiting PKR, was an effective IRF3 and -7 phosphorylation inhibitor These results suggest that a novel cellular protein that is activated by viral products in addition to dsRNA and is sensitive to E3L inhibition is responsible for IRF activation and reveal a novel mechanism for the anti-IFN effect of E3L distinct from its inhibition of PKR. IFN␤ expression is controlled by an enhanceosome that binds three distinct transcription factor complexes in the context of chromatin-organizing proteins [5] Each of these complexes, c-jun/ATF2 (AP1), IRF, and NF␬B, become active following protein phosphorylation events induced in response to virus infection. Cytomegalovirus, which is capable of activating IRF-dependent gene expression [20, 28], can do so from the cell surface without entering cells or replicating [29]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call