Abstract
Problem statement: This study describes that the Next Generation of Ne tworks (NGN) communication will supports multiple technologies, handles the mobility of end users to move through heterogeneous access networks, with ability to conn ect to different networks. Where the Internet Engin eer Task Force maintain (IETF) the Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6) to handles the mobility of networks (NEMO), to provide wide band and more scalable network services. One of the MIPv6 built-in features is Route Optimization (RO) to solve the inefficient route pr oblem. Conclusion/Recommendations: The main objective of this article is to survey, classify an d make a compression between the available schemes for route optimization over the last years depends on the bas ic criteria generated from the published articles w ithin different network topology. This article presents t he problem of suboptimal route which is further inc reased with increasing of nesting levels and there is no s uch one scheme is perfect for all network environme nts.
Highlights
The Mobile IPv6 protocol (MIPv6) (Johnson et al, 2004) known as a layer 3 protocol which allows mobile user’s services to ongoing and reachable independently on the movement of mobile nodes in the IP environment
Without supporting mobility in IPv6 protocol, the payload destined to the Mobile Network Node (MNN) could not be reached and delivered as far as the mobile node was change his current location away from home network
A Hierarchical Route Optimization (HROS): this proposed scheme by Gao T. for mobile network generation (Gao et al, 2008). This scheme use a new functional list MNN-Correspondent Node (CN) list that’s maintains the list dynamically through communication between CN and Depends on the Criteria, Table 1 presents a comparative summary of the schemes based on either the analytical models or the simulation experiments tested by each scheme separately for the above issues. After comparing these schemes wither if it’s topologically correct or incorrect we find that there
Summary
The Mobile IPv6 protocol (MIPv6) (Johnson et al, 2004) known as a layer 3 protocol which allows mobile user’s services (mobile nodes) to ongoing and reachable independently on the movement of mobile nodes in the IP environment. For keeping Mobile IP provides an IP node the ability to retain the same IP address and maintain uninterrupted network and application connectivity while traveling across networks. This will lead to breaks transports and higher layers connection. The Mobile IP protocol allows the Mobile Network Node (MNN) to move among heterogeneous subnets without changing its Home Address (HoA). This movement is absolutely transparent to the higher layers and packets sends to this node can be routed through the network regardless of its current location.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
