Abstract

Universal iodization of salt on the whole territory in Bulgaria was introduced in 1994. The external evaluation of an International expert group conducted in 2005, placed the country among those who successfully overcame the problem of iodine deficiency. AIM of the present study is to update the data on iodine intake of pregnant women in Bulgaria, given that there have been no studies in the last 8 years. MATERIAL: A total number of 537 pregnant women were recruited in the study with an average age 30.49±5 y, distributed by gestational weeks and according to the intake of (vitamins and minerals preparations) preparations containing vitamins with minerals. The study was conducted as a cross-sectional, multicenter population-based in 10 regions of Bulgaria (a total of 84 settlements), without pre-selection and 98.3% of the examined pregnant women use Bulgarian iodized salt according to the data from the Questionnaire. METHOD: A spot morning urine samples were collected for determination of urinary iodine concentration. The frozen samples in a special container were transported to the accredited Limbach laboratory in Heidelberg, Germany. The iodine in urine was determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) method. The statistical analysis was performed using standard SPSS 13.0 for Windows. RESULTS: The median urinary iodine concentration (mUIC) for the whole group of pregnant women (n-537) was 170 µg/L (95% CI 161.00 - 177.00). Normal iodine excretion is present in 39.3%, low – in 41.2% and over-optimal – in 19.6% of pregnant women. Significantly lower levels of iodine in urine were found in the third trimester of pregnancy compared to the first trimester (P < 0.012) and compared to the second trimester (P < 0.001). The median iodine concentration in pregnant women from the group supplemented with combined vitamins with minerals was significantly higher compared to the group without supplementation – 175 (95% CI 166.00 - 199.00) against 149 (95% CI 123.00 - 168.00), P < 0.021. CONCLUSION: During pregnancy, additional supplementation with combined vitamins with minerals containing iodine is required, regardless of the universal iodization of salt, introduced in Bulgaria for more than twenty-five years.

Highlights

  • Iodine deficiency is a serious public health and social problem that affects huge population groups in the so-called “endemic” areas with low iodine content in the environment

  • High risk groups for low iodine intake are pregnant women and infants, as the trace element is involved in the formation of brain structures and inadequate iodine intake during pregnancy and infancy seriously affects the cognitive development of the fetus and newborn [1,2,3]

  • We studied 537 pregnant women, mean age 30.49±5 y [95% CI: 30.06 - 30.91], median – 30 (18 - 47), [95% CI: 30 - 31]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Iodine deficiency is a serious public health and social problem that affects huge population groups in the so-called “endemic” areas with low iodine content in the environment. The reference group for assessing the effect of iodine prophylaxis are schoolchildren, aged 6-10 years, and the most convenient indicator for assessing iodine intake is the determination of the concentration of iodine in the urine [6,7,8]. This biochemical marker is used in the application of appropriate sampling and is a sensitive and specific analytical indicator. Iodine concentration in urine reflects immediate iodine intake and is a reliable screening indicator for population groups for which

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call