Abstract

Whereas the postrhinal cortex (POR) is a critical center for the integration of egocentric and allocentric spatial information, the perirhinal cortex (PRC) plays an important role in the encoding of objects that supports spatial learning. The POR and PRC send afferents to the hippocampus, a structure that builds complex associative memories from the spatial experience. Hippocampal encoding of item-place experience is accompanied by the nuclear expression of immediate early gene (IEGs). Subfields of the Cornus ammonius and subregions of the hippocampus exhibit differentiated and distinct encoding responses, depending on whether the spatial location and relationships of large highly visible items (macroscale encoding) or small partially concealed items (microscale encoding), is learned. But to what extent the PRC and POR support hippocampal processing of different kinds of item-place representations is unclear. Using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), we examined the effect of macroscale (overt, landmark) and microscale (subtle, discrete) item-place learning on the nuclear expression of the IEG, Arc. We observed an increase in Arc mRNA in the caudal part of PRC area 35 and the caudal part of the POR after macroscale, but not microscale item-place learning. The caudal part of PRC area 36, the rostral and middle parts of PRC areas 35 and 36, as well as the middle part of the POR responded to neither type of item. These results suggest that macroscale items may contain a strong identity component that is processed by specific compartments of the PRC and POR. In contrast small, microscale items are not encoded by the POR or PRC, indicating that item dimensions may play a role in the involvement of these structures in item processing.

Highlights

  • The parahippocampal regions comprise the perirhinal cortex (PRC), postrhinal cortex (POR), and entorhinal cortex, along with the presubiculum and parasubiculum (Witter et al, 2017)

  • Spatial information is processed in the POR and sent to the hippocampus via the medial entorhinal cortex (MEC), whereas non-spatial information is processed by the PRC via the lateral entorhinal cortex (LEC) before the hippocampus is involved (Burwell et al, 1995, 2004; Burwell and Amaral, 1998b; Eichenbaum and Lipton, 2008)

  • We explored whether microscale and macroscale item-place learning triggers nuclear mRNA expression of the immediate early gene (IEG) activity-regulated cytoskeletalassociated (Arc) in the middle and caudal POR as well as in the rostral, middle, and caudal PRC areas 35 and 36

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The parahippocampal regions comprise the perirhinal cortex (PRC), postrhinal cortex (POR), and entorhinal cortex, along with the presubiculum and parasubiculum (Witter et al, 2017). The POR projects to the LEC, which is involved in the encoding of an egocentric spatial map and in object recognition memory (Burwell, 2000; Wang et al, 2018; Doan et al, 2019; LaChance et al, 2019) These studies support that the POR may act as a conduit for spatial information processing directed to both entorhinal subdivisions (Winters et al, 2004; LaChance et al, 2019). The POR is involved in the processing of both spatial and non-spatial information (Furtak et al, 2012; Heimer-McGinn et al, 2017; Ramos, 2017; Burke et al, 2018)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call