Abstract

We show that mathfrak{s}mathfrak{u}(2) Lie algebras of coordinate operators related to quantum spaces with mathfrak{s}mathfrak{u}(2) noncommutativity can be conveniently represented by SO(3)-covariant poly-differential involutive representations. We show that the quantized plane waves ob-tained from the quantization map action on the usual exponential functions are determined by polar decomposition of operators combined with constraint stemming from the Wigner theorem for SU(2). Selecting a subfamily of ∗-representations, we show that the resulting star-product is equivalent to the Kontsevich product for the Poisson manifold dual to the finite dimensional Lie algebra mathfrak{s}mathfrak{u}(2) . We discuss the results, indicating a way to extend the construction to any semi-simple non simply connected Lie group and present noncommutative scalar field theories which are free from perturbative UV/IR mixing.

Highlights

  • To study quantum properties of the NCFT

  • We show that su(2) Lie algebras of coordinate operators related to quantum spaces with su(2) noncommutativity can be conveniently represented by SO(3)-covariant poly-differential involutive representations

  • We show that the quantized plane waves obtained from the quantization map action on the usual exponential functions are determined by polar decomposition of operators combined with constraint stemming from the Wigner theorem for SU(2)

Read more

Summary

The master equations

Be a differential representation, assumed to be an algebra homomorphism, where L(M(R3)) is the set of linear operators acting on M(R3). It is convenient to consider representations of the form [47, 48]. Valid for any functional h of xμ and ∂μ, one finds that (2.5) obeys the su(2) Lie algebra structure (2.3) provided the following functional differential equations. Highlighting the possible choices for differential representations satisfying su(2) commutation relations. Let us go back to representations satisfying the whole set of equations (2.26)– (2.31). By observing that h = θ solves both (2.26) and (2.27) trivially, one finds the following family of ∗-representations (2.5) (with SO(3)-covariance): xμ = xα f (∆)δαμ + g(∆)∂α∂μ + iθεαμρ∂ρ + (∆)∂μ,

Discussion and example
A natural group cohomological setting
Determination of the quantized plane waves
Closed star-product
Discussion
A Computation of eipx I
B Basics on group cohomology
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call