Involuntary psychiatric admission: Characteristics of the referring doctors and the doctors’ experiences of being pressured

Abstract

Background: In Norway, doctors may make the decision to refer patients to involuntary psychiatric treatment. This is a difficult decision, as it involves a range of medical, legal and ethical challenges. The decision to commit is presumed based on an independent assessment of the patient and whether a set of medico-legal criteria is met. Aims: To examine characteristics of GPs that admitted patients involuntarily to a psychiatric hospital, and to examine how the GPs assessed this process. Methods: 74 doctors who had referred patients to involuntary admission at one major Norwegian psychiatric hospital participated in semi-structured interviews. The questions posed were in part factual and in part about the participating doctors’ assessments and considerations with respect to the involuntary admission of psychiatric patients. Results: Approximately half of the participating doctors worked at the public out-of-hours clinics, while a fifth were the patients’ family doctors. Those working at the out-of-hours clinics had less work experience and fewer had prior knowledge of the patients they committed. About half the doctors felt it was difficult to apply the medico-legal criteria. More than half had felt pressured/advised to refer the patient to hospital and about half had felt pressured/advised to do so involuntarily. Conclusions: While doctors considering the commitment of psychiatric patients are presumed to make independent assessments of patients based on medico-legal criteria, this study suggests that many doctors feel pressured to commit. Clinical implications: The assessment made by doctors who refer patients involuntarily to psychiatric hospital may be influenced by other parts of the health service, the patient's family and the police. Many doctors feel that it is difficult to apply the medico-legal criteria when referring patients involuntarily.