Abstract
Involuntary inpatient commitment is a legal reality that includes the need for clinical assessment. Such judgments by mental health professionals have traditionally favored the need for treatment over a person's expressed wish for liberty. With courts deferring to the judgments of mental health professionals, a high threshold for inpatient commitment set forth by the U.S. Supreme Court is effectively lowered. While this infringement of rights can easily be blamed on the courts, the remedy need not be left to them. Mental health professionals have an opportunity to uphold a high standard for involuntary commitment through expressing clinical opinion that supports a person's legitimate right to refuse treatment. The impetus to do so can be found in a recovery orientation that emphasizes the importance of self-directed treatment, choice, and civil rights as guiding principles.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.