Abstract
SummaryBrewin and Andrews (2016) make many cogent observations on the state of knowledge about the development of false autobiographical beliefs and false recollections. Owing to inconsistent use of terminology and imprecise definitions, the framework they propose does not clearly map onto the studies that are summarized, making the resulting estimates of the magnitude of effects across studies unconvincing. A singular focus on the development of ‘full memories’ is not explained, and the key role of autobiographical belief in influencing behavior is underemphasized. Furthermore, the legal applications discussed are not well defined and are limited in scope. Fostering false belief or false imagery for events such as childhood abuse is unacceptable, whether or not suggested events come to be experienced as vivid believed recollections. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Highlights
The concepts that the authors propose are certainly interesting
We are glad to see that the belief-recollection distinction that we have introduced and developed is given a central role in this assessment of false memory studies (Mazzoni & Kirsch, 2002; Mazzoni, Scoboria & Harvey, 20103; Scoboria, Mazzoni, Kirsch & Relyea, 2004; Scoboria et al, 2014)
At least five concepts are included by this point: autobiographical belief, imagery, confidence in veridicality of imagery, recollective experience, and confidence in memory experience
Summary
The concepts that the authors propose are certainly interesting. the elements included in their framework are not consistently defined. We are glad to see that the belief-recollection distinction that we have introduced and developed is given a central role in this assessment of false memory studies (Mazzoni & Kirsch, 2002; Mazzoni, Scoboria & Harvey, 20103; Scoboria, Mazzoni, Kirsch & Relyea, 2004; Scoboria et al, 2014).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.