(Invited) Challanges with Novel Binders for LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 li-Ion Battery Electrodes

Abstract

In the search for high-energy density Li-ion battery electrode materials which are also comparatively sustainanble, LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 (LNMO) is often targeted as a promising next-generation alternative. While the capacity of LNMO is limited, it has a high operating voltage around 4.7 V vs. Li+/Li, and the spinel structure of the materials renders useful power capacilities. Moreover, it is a cobalt-free cathode. However, fabricating functional electrodes have shown problematic due to inherent instabilities at both bulk and surfaces, where especially operation at elevated temperatures has shown to cause capacity degradation. Problems comprise structural changes, loss of oxygen, and Mn dissolution, often interconnected with each other. One strategy to improve stabilization would be through coatings of the LNMO particles, either inorganic or organic.The polymer binder used for battery processing is inherently an organic coating layer, since it wraps around the particles of the electrodes. Thereby, binders has been shown to being able to add functionalities to electrode materials, e.g. to improve electronic conductivity, add storage capacity or mitigate side-reactions. The binder is at interplay with the reactions causing interphase layer formation. Thereby, changing or taioring the binder can cause direct improvements in cell performance.Poly(vinylidene difluoride) (PVdF) and its many derviates is since long time the standard for Li-ion battery electrodes, despite not being particular sustainable and being dependent on toxic solvents such as N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP). LNMO is, in this context, no exception. Nevertheless, while PVdF is chemically intert, it provides little other capabilities to the battery electrodes, and other binder systems could improve in this context: either through electochemica performance or through being more sustainable.Here, two other binder systems for LNMO are discussed: polyacrylonitrile (PAN) and polyacrylic acid (PAA). Polynitriles are often promoted as being comparatively stable at higher potentials, while also being ionically conductive, and should therefore in principle add functionalities into the resulting electrodes. PAA, on the other hand, has shown good adhesion and adherence to oxide surfaces, and can thereby form more robust interfacial layers on the cathode. We show here, however, that challenges remain for these alternative binder systems, not least due to the high operating potential of LNMO electrodes which cause side-reactions of both types of alternative binders. These side-reactions are their products are analyzed through a range of methods, e.g. photoelectron spectroscopy, electron microscopy and electroanalytical techniques, thereby providing guidance to the development of novel binders for high-voltage electrodes.