Abstract
This study explores the use of invitations as requests for service. The data consist of 246 authentic emailed requests and invitations addressed to faculty members from editors and other institutional entities to solicit reviews of manuscripts, abstracts, and promotion dossiers. These are contrasted with academic invitations to participate in symposia, give talks, contribute chapters, or visit campuses. Four types of evidence, the naming of speech acts, the format of the head acts, the use of components that appear exclusively in requests, and the benefactive status argue that service invitations, in spite of their outward benefactive status, are in fact requests, and that the invitation format is a request-for-service mitigator. For the recipient, the use of invitations enhances the perlocutionary effect (invitations are face boosting) and appears to allow greater freedom of response; for the initiator, the use of invitations in request-for-service contexts allows the sending of reminders to respond (a social expectation for invitations) and permits the withdrawal of the invitation (or disinvitation) in case of non-response.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.