Invisible Moral Wounds of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Are We Experiencing Moral Injury?

We aim to investigate the interplay between moral distress and moral injury among nurses working in palliative and oncology wards and to assess its impact on nursing leadership. The past 2 years have been particularly challenging for nurses and nursing leaders in Croatia. The coronavirus disease pandemic and the subsequent earthquakes in the country significantly impacted the work of nurses. Moral distress has been well-known to nursing professionals, but recent studies warn about cofounding it with moral injury and their possible intercorrelation, deserving more attention from an empirical perspective. We conducted quantitative cross-sectional research in palliative and oncology wards in 11 Croatian health care facilities on 162 nurses, using a questionnaire and paper/pencil method over 6 months (1 January 2021 to 1 July 2021). The questionnaire consisted of three parts: sociodemographic data, a Measure of moral distress for health care professionals and Moral injury symptoms scale for health care professionals. The research protocol was approved by the Ethics committee of the Catholic University of Croatia under no. 1-21-04. The findings of our study demonstrated that the current average levels of moral distress might be characterized as low, but the moral injury symptoms are severe. The results of our study bring interesting novel insights, such as the strong correlation between moral distress and moral injury, but also in terms of nurses' decision to leave or consider leaving their position. The nurses who experience higher levels of moral distress experience severe symptoms of moral injury, while nurses who score higher in moral distress and moral injury have left, considered or consider leaving their positions. This study highlighted the need to pay attention to the emerging phenomenon of moral injury that has been unaddressed and overshadowed by moral distress, their intercorrelation, and the importance of addressing them timely and adequately within health care organizations with their leadership and management. These findings provide a significant insight that may assist nursing managers and leaders to act and respond in time to develop various prevention and mitigation measures and help resolve situations leading to moral distress or moral injury.

When Pandemics Collide: The Impact of COVID-19 on Childhood Obesity

The Wicked Problem of Physician Well-Being.

Telemedicine and the COVID-19 Pandemic, Lessons for the Future.

Moral Distress and Moral Injury in Nephrology During the COVID-19 Pandemic

During the COVID-19 pandemic, health and social care workers (HSCWs) are facing morally challenging situations and life-threatening decisions. Following exposure to potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs) that undermine deeply held moral beliefs and expectations, HSCWs might experience moral injury (MI) and other deleterious psychiatric consequences. The present study examined associations between exposure to PMIEs, MI symptoms, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), complex PTSD (CPTSD), and self-criticism among HSCWs. A sample of 296 Israeli HSCWs responded to online validated self-report questionnaires in a cross-sectional designed survey in February and March 2021. Participants' self-reported PTSD (8.9%) and CPTSD (4.8%) rates match the rates of Israel's general population. A moderated-mediation model shows that high self-criticism intensified the relations between exposure to PMIEs and MI symptoms, and between MI symptoms and CPTSD symptoms. Importantly, the indirect effect of exposure to PMIEs on both PTSD and CPTSD symptoms via MI symptoms existed only among those with high levels of self-criticism. The study's findings offer a novel overview of the associations between patterns of exposure to PMIEs, MI, PTSD, and CPTSD. Clinicians treating HSCWs coping with COVID-19-related moral injury should be aware of the importance of high self-criticism in the possible posttraumatic sequelae of exposure to PMIEs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Background: Moral injury (MI) involves distress over having transgressed or violated core moral boundaries, accompanied by feelings of guilt, shame, self-condemnation, loss of trust, loss of meaning, and spiritual struggles. MI is often found in Veterans and Active Duty Military personnel with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). MI is widespread among those with PTSD symptoms, adversely affects mental health, and may increase risk of suicide; however, MI is often ignored and neglected by mental health professionals who focus their attention on PTSD only. Methods: A review of the literature between 1980 and 2018 conducted in 2018 is presented here to identify scales used to assess MI. Databases used in this review were PsychInfo, PubMed (Medline), and Google Scholar. Search terms were “moral injury,” “measuring,” “screening,” “Veterans,” and “Active Duty Military.” Inclusion criteria were quantitative measurement of MI and health outcomes, Veteran or Active Duty Military status, and peer-review publication. Excluded were literature reviews, dissertations, book chapters, case reports, and qualitative studies. Results: Of the 730 studies identified, most did not meet eligibility criteria, leaving 118 full text articles that were reviewed, of which 42 did not meet eligibility criteria. Of the remaining 76 studies, 34 were duplicates leaving 42 studies, most published in 2013 or later. Of 22 studies that assessed MI, five used scales assessing multiple dimensions, and 17 assessed only one or two aspects (e.g., guilt, shame, or forgiveness). The remaining 20 studies used one of the scales reported in the first 22. Of the five scales assessing multiple dimensions of MI, two assess both morally injurious events and symptoms and the remaining three assess symptoms only. All studies were cross-sectional, except three that tested interventions. Conclusions: MI in the military setting is widespread and associated with PTSD symptom severity, anxiety, depression, and risk of suicide in current or former military personnel. Numerous measures exist to assess various dimensions of MI, including five multidimensional scales, although future research is needed to identify cutoff scores and clinically significant change scores. Three multidimensional measures assess MI symptoms alone (not events) and may be useful for determining if treatments directed at MI may both reduce symptoms and impact other mental health outcomes including PTSD.

Exposure to morally injurious events may have a severe, prolonged negative impact on psychosocial functioning, known as moral injury (MI). Research into the prevalence of MI has mostly focused on event exposure rather than on psychosocial impact. Also, the relationship between MI and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) remains a matter of interest. The aim of this study was to identify MI and PTSD symptom profiles among trauma-exposed, treatment-seeking police officers and military veterans, and to explore demographic and clinical differences between symptom profiles. Latent class and multinomial regression analyses were conducted in a sample of 1,703 participants, using the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 and the Brief Symptom Inventory. Four classes of participants were identified, labeled as a MI class (n = 192; 11.27%), a MI-PTSD class (n = 565; 33.18%), a PTSD class (n = 644; 37.82%), and a Neither MI-nor PTSD class (n = 302; 17.73%), resulting in 44.45% (n = 757) of participants who met an MI symptom profile with or without PTSD. There were significant differences between the classes in terms of gender as well as PTSD and comorbid psychopathology symptom severity, the latter of which was highest in the MI-PTSD class. In conclusion, a substantial subgroup of trauma-exposed, treatment-seeking police officers and military veterans could be classified as suffering from MI. Routinely screening for MI in treatment-seeking police officers and military veterans is recommended, and interventions aimed at relieving MI in these populations may be indicated.

Moral Injury (MI) and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) are potential outcomes following combat military service which exposes veterans to a range of potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs). Given the hypothesized social nature of MI symptoms, it was predicted that System Justification, the tendency to defend and justify systems, even when they may be disadvantageous, would be uniquely related to MI, compared to PTSD. A total of 146 male combat veterans filled in questionnaires relating to PMIEs (MIES), MI (EMIS-short), PTSD symptoms (PCL-5) and System Justification (GSJS). PMIEs (self, other and betrayal related) were all related to higher levels of MI. A parallel mediation model was conducted and demonstrated that PMIEs (self) were associated with higher levels of MI and PTSD symptoms and that MI symptoms mediated the relationship between PMIEs (self) and lower System Justification. There was no mediation effect of PTSD symptoms. This relationship was strongest when veterans did not perform reserve duty and thus were not affiliated with the military. The findings support the theory that MI symptomology, as opposed to PTSD symptomology, has a greater relationship with worldviews such as the relationship to societal systems and that this is greatest when transitioned to civilian life.

Military service may place veterans at increased risk for perpetrating, witnessing, or failing to prevent events that violate deeply held moral values. In some cases, veterans may develop moral injury (MI) symptoms that transcend and/or overlap with mental health conditions such as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and major depressive disorder (MDD). Further, PTSD and MDD are 2 established risk factors for chronic pain. However, research has not examined the association between MI symptoms and chronic pain. We tested whether MI would emerge as a salient correlate of concurrent reports of chronic pain in the presence of PTSD and MDD symptom severity among 59 veterans seeking integrated behavioral health care. Findings indicated the severity of MI symptoms was significantly linked with veterans' concurrent reports of chronic pain. Self-directed MI symptoms emerged as a correlate of worse pain in the presence of PTSD and MDD. Preliminary findings demonstrate possible associations between MI and chronic pain among veterans with a need for holistic health care. Future research should examine mechanisms for an apparent MI-chronic pain link. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Citation:Gupta MA. Spontaneous reporting of onset of disturbing dreams and nightmares related to early life traumatic experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic by patients with posttraumatic stress ...

During the COVID-19 pandemic, many health professionals endured moral distress and moral injury. Whereas many stories about moral distress in hospitals and care facilities were shared, little is known about moral injury among health care personnel and among public health professionals. This workshop wants to offer an opportunity to open a conversation about moral injury in general, in health care personnel and in in public health experts. The public health community should not shy away from openly discussing moral injury and moral distress due to the the Covid-19 pandemic. It is necessary to collect the stories about the situations where members of the public health community were hindered in doing what was the ethically appropriate action due to circumstances beyond their control.Objectives of this workshop are: Clarifying the concept of moral injury and moral distressUnderstanding what ‘ethically appropriate actions' are in times of a pandemicOffering a platform for sharing stories of moral distress Key messages Moral distress and moral injury are potential modifiable mental conditions in times of disaster and stressIdentifying determinants of moral distress and moral injury is necessary to optimize Public health responses to disasters

The Psychiatric Ramifications of Moral Injury Among Veterans

Objective At some point in their career, many healthcare workers will experience psychological distress associated with being unable to take morally or ethically correct action, as it aligns with their own values; a phenomenon known as moral distress. Similarly, there are increasing reports of healthcare workers experiencing long-term mental and psychological pain, alongside internal dissonance, known as moral injury. This review examined the triggers and factors associated with moral distress and injury in Health and Social Care Workers (HSCW) employed across a range of clinical settings with the aim of understanding how to mitigate the effects of moral distress and identify potential preventative interventions. Methods A systematic review was conducted and reported according to recommendations from Cochrane and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Searches were conducted and updated regularly until January 2024 on 2 main databases (CENTRAL, PubMed) and three specialist databases (Scopus, CINAHL, PsycArticles), alongside hand searches of study registration databases and other systematic reviews reference lists. Eligible studies included a HSCW sample, explored moral distress/injury as a main aim, and were written in English or Italian. Verbatim quotes were extracted, and article quality was assessed via the CASP toolkit. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify patterns and arrange codes into themes. Specific factors like culture and diversity were explored, and the effects of exceptional circumstances like the pandemic. Results Fifty-one reports of 49 studies were included in the review. Causes and triggers were categorised under three domains: individual, social, and organisational. At the individual level, patients’ care options, professionals’ beliefs, locus of control, task planning, and the ability to make decisions based on experience, were indicated as elements that can cause or trigger moral distress. In addition, and relevant to the CoVID-19 pandemic, was use/access to personal protection resources. The social or relational factors were linked to the responsibility for advocating for and communication with patients and families, and professionals own support network. At organisational levels, hierarchy, regulations, support, workload, culture, and resources (staff and equipment) were identified as elements that can affect professionals’ moral comfort. Patients’ care, morals/beliefs/standards, advocacy role and culture of context were the most referenced elements. Data on cultural differences and diversity were not sufficient to make assumptions. Lack of resources and rapid policy changes have emerged as key triggers related to the pandemic. This suggests that those responsible for policy decisions should be mindful of the potential impact on staff of sudden and top-down change. Conclusion This review indicates that causes and triggers of moral injury are multifactorial and largely influenced by the context and constraints within which professionals work. Moral distress is linked to the duty and responsibility of care, and professionals’ disposition to prioritise the wellbeing of patients. If the organisational values and regulations are in contrast with individuals’ beliefs, repercussions on professionals’ wellbeing and retention are to be expected. Organisational strategies to mitigate against moral distress, or the longer-term sequalae of moral injury, should address the individual, social, and organisational elements identified in this review.

Apocalypse perhaps.