Abstract
Two conflicting behavioral models, under-reaction and over-reaction, have been proposed as explanations for the long-run abnormal return patterns following a variety of corporate events. We test hypotheses that distinguish between these two behavioral models for four corporate events, seasoned equity offerings, share repurchases, stock-financed acquisitions and cash-financed acquisitions. The evidence is consistent with the hypothesis that long-run abnormal returns are attributable to the investor under-reaction model. Investors under-react to short-term information available prior to the event and subsequently under-react to information conveyed by the corporate event. Long-run abnormal returns reflect the net effect of investor under-reaction to these two pieces of information. We find no evidence to support the over-reaction model. We also find no evidence to support a more complicated behavioral model that postulates investor under-reaction to short-term information and over-reaction to long-term trends.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.