Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of investor protection on audit fees using a quasi-natural experiment provided by the introduction of the E-interaction platform in China. E-interaction provided investors with a platform to communicate directly with listed companies and participate in discussions of corporate matters, thereby enhancing the rights and interests of small and medium-sized investors, i.e. investor protection. Employing a difference-in-differences design, I find that, firms listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange experienced a large reduction in audit fees after the adoption of E-interaction. The results are robust to changes in event windows and alternative research designs. Further analyses demonstrate that the reduction in audit fees was greater for firms with a higher level of expropriation of minority shareholders, i.e. tunnelling. I also find that controlling shareholders’ tunneling behaviours decreased after the introduction of E-interaction. Taken together, my results suggest that increased investor protection reduces audit fees by mitigating agency conflicts between the controlling shareholder and minority shareholders.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call