Abstract

We provide evidence that investors with leverage constraints demand leverage, for the sake of leverage. We study the equity closed-end fund (CEF) market and document a strong negative relation between fund leverage and CEF discounts, indicating that investors pay a relative premium for leverage. We show that leverage changes do not signal improved fund performance. Instead, the only benefit to investors of increased leverage is amplified exposure via greater volatility and risk exposure. We utilize a quasi-natural experiment to identify leverage as a causal driver of demand and provide external validity by relating our results to the betting-against-beta factor.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call