Abstract
We provide evidence that investors with leverage constraints demand leverage, for the sake of leverage. We study the equity closed-end fund (CEF) market and document a strong negative relation between fund leverage and CEF discounts, indicating that investors pay a relative premium for leverage. We show that leverage changes do not signal improved fund performance. Instead, the only benefit to investors of increased leverage is amplified exposure via greater volatility and risk exposure. We utilize a quasi-natural experiment to identify leverage as a causal driver of demand and provide external validity by relating our results to the betting-against-beta factor.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
