Abstract

Understanding company effort on managing corporate reputation and corporate value are challenging tasks among investors. This paper provides an estimated relationship of earning persistence, financial leverage, and foreign ownership on corporate reputation and corporate value on non-financial companies listed in Indonesian Stock Exchange. Data are collected from a five-year observation period, ranging 2014 to 2018. A Non probability sampling technique is purposively used to determine the data quality. The collected data are analyzed and processed using SEM method. This study provides a qualitative result showing the relationship among the variables. The financial leverage has no significant effect on company value. In addition, financial leverage also has no significant impact on company reputation compared to foreign ownership toward company reputation. Earning persistence has significantly affected the company value followed by income variability with equal effect toward corporate reputation. Future study can add additional independent variables such as free cash flow and growth opportunities to expand this study.

Highlights

  • Investors today need to make investment decisions in the capital market based on facts, data, and financial analysis that is appropriate with a rational approach to determine the results of their investments

  • Based on the background of the question, the question in this study is how the influence of Earning Persistence, Financial Leverage, Foreign Ownership toward Company Value mediated by Company Reputation

  • The purpose of this study was to determine how the influence of Earning Persistence, Financial Leverage, Foreign Ownership toward Company Value mediated by Company Reputation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Investors today need to make investment decisions in the capital market based on facts, data, and financial analysis that is appropriate with a rational approach to determine the results of their investments. Kamasak (2017) states that intangible assets have a greater contribution to the company's market performance than tangible assets. Chau and Gray (2010) examined the effect of ownership on the performance of foreign and domestic companies that are in groups and independent. The results state that there are significant differences in performance monitored by foreign companies compared to domestic companies. Companies that are monitored by foreigners have better performance. A possible reason is that foreign institutions choose companies that are related to the group and have a better level of transparency. They have better monitoring capabilities than domestic ones

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call