Abstract

In this paper, we first introduce investment-specific technology (IST) shocks to an otherwise standard real business cycle model and show that a thoughtful calibration of them along the lines of Raffo (2009) successfully addresses the quantity, international comovement, Backus-Smith, and puzzles. Second, we use OECD data for the relative price of investment to build and estimate these IST processes across the U.S and a rest of the world aggregate, showing that they are cointegrated and well represented by a vector error correction model (VECM). Finally, we demonstrate that when we fit such estimated IST processes in the model instead of the calibrated ones, the shocks are actually not as powerful to explain any of the four montioned puzzles.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call