Abstract
Seven investment tribunals may soon have to determine whether Crimea constitutes Russian or Ukrainian territory under international law. This should create some discomfort, as investment tribunals arguably should not have the power to settle territorial sovereignty disputes. This Article explores the merits of two potential objections to the admissibility of claims concerning investments on disputed territory: the doctrine of indispensable parties and the doctrine of indispensable issues.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
