Abstract
Socially responsible mandated mutual funds are a popular class of funds characterized by strategies that address sustainability, responsibility, and impact. The dramatic growth of socially responsible mandated mutual funds during the last decade, makes it important to understand how their social metrics (environmental, social, and governance; ESG) relates to their financial performance. This article compares the risk-adjusted returns of socially responsible mutual funds (SRMF) with funds rated by Morningstar® Portfolio ESG ScoreTM grouped into low, medium, and high ratings. We find that during the period of pre-recession boom, the funds with high-ESG ratings had a significantly higher risk-adjusted performance than did funds with a low-ESG or mid-ESG rating. This trend continued during the early parts of the Great Recession. During periods of economic recovery and growth, SRMF rated low on ESG performed significantly better than highly rated SRMFs. For medium rated SRMFs, other than prior to the Great Recession, fund performance was not consistently significantly different from highly rated SRMFs.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
