Abstract

AbstractIn this paper we evaluate an indivisible investment project that is carried out in a corporation under very simple premises. In particular, we discuss a one-period model with certainty, the pure domestic case and proportional tax rates. Surprisingly, the decision problem turns out to be rather complex if one has to make allowance for different taxation of the corporation and its owner. Altogether there are more than 10 cases that have to be distinguished if the firm’s managers want to make a correct decision, depending on the relation of personal and corporate tax rates.

Highlights

  • For a long time business studies have dealt with the evaluation of taxable investments under the assumption of certainty

  • It is evaluated whether the investment is to be preferred over its default alternative, measured by the financial resources which are available at the end of the planning period

  • We have presented the evaluation of an indivisible investment carried out in a corporation

Read more

Summary

Problem

For a long time business studies have dealt with the evaluation of taxable investments under the assumption of certainty. The taxation consequences of different ways to finance an investment are rarely considered when valuing investments.1 This is especially important if the investment is carried out by a corporation subject to tax. Regarding certainty it is assumed that the investor owns a corporation subject to tax and that a shareholder relief system is applied.. Regarding certainty it is assumed that the investor owns a corporation subject to tax and that a shareholder relief system is applied.6 It is evaluated whether the investment is to be preferred over its default alternative, measured by the financial resources which are available at the end of the planning period (terminal value). The function of the model is rather to evaluate tax effects on the investor’s objective (here, the terminal value) in an extremely simplified and stylized decision situation.

Assumptions
Relevant payments and budget restrictions
General description of the terminal value
Dividend contribution
Credit contribution
Tax-optimized default alternative
Scenario d
15 The diagram is based on the following values
Options of financing the investment project
Optimal financing of the investment project
Scenario b
Scenario c
Detailed instructions
Terminal value differences for all possible constellations
The default alternative yields a terminal value in scenario b as follows:
A remark on net present values
Numerical examples
Country comparison
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.