Abstract
Non-life insurers often claim that they are lead to reach out for extremely risky assets in the composition of their investment portfolio when their underwriting results deteriorate. In this paper we develop a model which attempts to explain the real behavior of investment portfolios of non-life insurance companies. The model is extended to include several variables over which the analysis is completed, namely the underwriting result, the premiums, the funds generating coefficient. The model is then subjected to a comparative statics analysis in order to examine the behavior of the portfolio composition in response to changes in the above mentioned variables. We show that the arguments developed by non-life insurers are at least questionable and critically dependent upon the increase and/or decrease of risk aversion measures.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
