Abstract
AbstractFeatures of the systematic errors of the Carlsberg Automatic Meridian Circle (CAMC) reference frame are investigated using a secondary radio reference frame defined by a set of astrometric VLA, VLBI and submillimetric positions of radio stars, taken from the literature. The radio positions of 62 stars are compared against the corresponding CAMC positions. The systematic errors of the CAMC catalogue are found to be generally smaller than 005. The radio positions were also compared with the positions obtained with the Bordeaux Automatic Meridian Circle (BORD). It was found a good coincidence between (CAMC–Radio) and (BORD–Radio) systematic differences.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
