Abstract
In this paper, a methodology for coupled fluid–structure model reduction is proposed. The overall objective of the method is to reduce the numerical computational costs without affecting the accuracy level of the prediction. This methodology is organized according to the three following steps. In the first step, this method uses a reliable criterion for selecting the number of the kept modes for the fluid and the structure in vacuo subsystems. In the second step, this basis will be enriched through static residual responses taking into account the fluid–structure coupling effects. These responses are selected according to an energetic criterion. Finally, the enriched basis is extended by introducing some residual static responses due to the error forces considered as structural modifications forces. In the context of the finite element method (FEM), the performances of the proposed method are established through a comparative study with other strategies that are proposed in the literature. Thus, the computational cost (CPU time) and the accuracies of the different methods are discussed and compared with a reference method. The validation of the proposed method and the comparative study are performed through two numerical simulation examples. The first one concerns a parallelepiped acoustic cavity with a simply supported plate. The method can handle both weak and strong couplings; as illustrated in the examples. The second one consists of a pipe with a strong coupling and a larger model size.
Highlights
Nowadays, new commercial and normative strategies are based on the customer orientation principle
The aim of the present study is to find a reduction basis to minimize the computational cost with sufficient precision in the prediction
For a weak coupling, the proposed method predicts the vibroacoustic indicators with an error of about 0.004 dB and a reduction in computation time by 89 per cent over a complete model
Summary
New commercial and normative strategies are based on the customer orientation principle. In the automotive and aerospace sectors, acoustic and vibration comfort is one of the most important benefits for customer satisfaction. In this context, the mastering of design parameters becomes an essential key point in the creation process of new products. One can distinguish several formulations in the elaboration of the equations governing the fluid– structure interaction problem. These formulations are characterised by the state variable of the corresponding fluid domain [3, 4, 5]. A constraint relating the pressure and the displacement of the wall is taken into account [6] to overcome the indeterminacy problem
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.